SANA'A January 05. 2024(Saba)- The escalatory steps taken by the revolution leader, Sayyed Abdul Malik Badr al-Din al-Houthi, supported by a broad Yemeni popular consensus in solidarity with the Palestinians, constituted a strong shock to the Zionist entity, and caused a state of terror in America and Western countries.
In an unexpected step, the Red Sea from the Gulf of Aqaba to Bab al-Mandab became forbidden for the Zionist entity to cross, whether by ships belonging to it, companies dealing with it, or any ships and ships owned by Israeli figures.
In a miserable attempt to curb the official and popular Yemeni position in support of the Palestinians, the American move came to try to control the waterway in the Red Sea, under the pretext of protecting navigation, but in reality its aim was to protect Israeli ships heading to its ports to support them and supply them with weapons, fuel and food at a time when they were still.
Gaza Strip's people are subjected to an unjust siege and the prevention of all food and medical aid from entering them in full view of the world.
American arrogance resulted in disappointment in the formation of that coalition, in which it tried to involve a number of countries for the sake of Israel’s interests, as many of the countries that had agreed to participate in it retreated, and America’s main allies abandoned their participation in these movements aimed at preventing the Yemeni Navy from targeting ships. The Zionist entity and destined for the ports controlled by the Zionist entity in Palestine.
Through this coalition, the American administration wanted to provide an international response to the operations of the Yemeni naval forces against Israeli ships and those linked to Israel in the Red Sea. However, many of America’s allies expressed their unwillingness to be publicly associated with this coalition, and others declared their refusal to engage in it.
Press reports attributed the reluctance of some US allies to participate in this coalition to the state of disintegration, division and rift that the coalition is suffering from on the one hand. It also reflects the shaky image of America and reveals the extent of its weakness and the collapse of the hegemony for which it was known.
Although the American move was supported by Britain, Greece and other countries, many of those mentioned in the American announcement were quick to withdraw and not get involved in this coalition directly. According to observers, that reflects the fear of these countries about the Yemeni military reaction, which says and implements what you say it.
Commenting on the American movements in the Red Sea, the highest political member, Muhammad Ali Al-Houthi, confirmed in press statements that the alleged coalition is to protect Israeli ships and not to protect international navigation.
He explained that when America calls for the militarization of the Red Sea, it confirms that it is the one who wants to prevent navigation in the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden and Bab al-Mandab, and through that it seeks to support the massacres and war of extermination in which the Americans participate with the Zionists against Gaza's people.
He also stressed that America will be the biggest loser if it causes an expansion of the battle in the Red Sea, pointing out that the Yemeni people do not care about everything Washington is doing and will continue their role and duty in order to stop the aggression against Gaza.
Al-Houthi pointed out that the operations of the Yemeni armed forces and navy did not have any impact on international navigation as they only target Israeli ships heading to the usurping entity in the occupied territories, while all ships are safe and have absolute freedom in maritime navigation.
Western sources suggested that it was not yet clear whether the American failure resulted from disagreements with its regional allies or because of the logistical difficulties it faces related to financing, but the failure is added to a series of American failures in light of Washington’s complete bias towards the Zionist entity in its brutal aggression against Gaza and the escalation of anger. Popular influence in the region, which limits support for its regimes for fear of political and social repercussions.
Observers attributed these clear objections, reservations, and the very limited participation in the alleged coalition, to the fact that coalition was originally dead, as the United States only wanted to create an international cover for its hostile move in the Red Sea, after failing to create a real coalition.
They pointed out that the objections and reservations of the countries participating in the American coalition explain the arrival of the clear messages sent by the leader of the revolution, Sayyed Abdul-Malik Badr al-Din al-Houthi, in his historic speech on the twentieth of last December, in which he warned the countries of the world against being drawn into the American efforts to implicate them in order to protect the entity of the Zionist enemy and escalation in the region.
The Yemeni options did not end only with these positions, but they were clear through the frank and clear threats of the revolution leader in his warnings about America’s efforts to militarize the Red Sea and threaten international navigation, in which Yemenis stressed the responsibility of all countries bordering the Red Sea to move against the aggressive and intrusive American position because of its damage to international navigation.
The warnings also included a call on these countries to take a clear stance against the American position, which violates the rights of these countries and threatens their security and stability.
The revolution leader advised all countries that the Americans seek to implicate themselves not to implicate themselves, not to sacrifice their interests and lose the security of their navigation in the service of the Zionists.
He pointed out that whoever moves with the Americans and implicates himself in protecting Israeli ships is providing an exclusive service to Israel and harming international navigation.
The Revolutionary Leader's speech showed the clear state of confusion in American policy in the Middle East and the reality of the hegemony it claims, using its agents in the region who abandoned it following the warnings of the Revolutionary Leader, which the world takes seriously.
The Yemeni strategic options represented a striking force in the region that broke America's back and squandered its dominance and presence in the Red and Arab Bahrain, its attempts to internationalize and militarize the sea lanes in response to the Yemeni position, which confused all the papers of the coalition to protect Israeli ships that the United States announced.
Observers and followers confirmed that the historic speech of the revolution leader had a strong impact on all local, regional and international levels, and had a remarkable presence in exposing the forces of treason and collaboration.
They also confirmed Yemen’s firm position towards supporting the Palestinians and siding with the largest issue in the nation’s history, which are positions that cannot be doubted. About its justice and victory, no matter how enemies form global coalition , utter empty and ringing threats.
In contrast to the shaking status of the Zionist entity and the United States of America as superpowers that have dominated the world for decades, the Yemeni leadership's position and people has emerged in support of the Palestinian cause and the legitimate rights of the Palestinians, which has made it deservedly take the lead in the Arab and Islamic positions, and even take the lead on the scene after it stood against the forces of Evil, tyranny and global criminality.
J.A
resource : SABA
| more of (Reports) |