Sana'a - Saba:
In one of the most complex security confrontations the Islamic Republic of Iran has faced since the victory of the revolution, the security services were able to absorb a highly dangerous intelligence breach carried out by multinational spy cells led by the Israeli Mossad, they transformed this challenge into a rare security opportunity to turn the tide and expose the enemy's tools deep within Iran.
The recently revealed operation was not a fleeting encounter, but rather a complex intelligence engagement planned over years. In addition to the Mossad, American, British, French, and German intelligence agencies, as well as Arab and Islamic actors, participated in the operation, these networks were activated at precise timing, with the aim of carrying out sabotage and assassination operations as part of a coordinated security escalation that coincided with the military attacks on Tehran.
According to informed sources, the dismantled cells had reached advanced stages of implementation and were dealt with as part of a comprehensive security plan that absorbed the shock and thwarted a series of sabotage plots against sovereign facilities, marking a qualitative shift in the course of the confrontation with the Zionist enemy.
Observers believe that what happened cannot be read in isolation from a long process of silent confrontation that began years ago, passed through assassinations and infiltration attempts, and reached this chapter, which revealed many cards that had been managed in the shadows, the enemy intelligence services, especially the Mossad, not only lost their members, but also burned their files, destroyed their networks, and left their agents to face their fate, at a moment when many analysts expressed a collapse on the ground at the level of the hidden war.
In a related field context, clear indications of the impact of this achievement on the enemy's infrastructure have emerged, including the disappearance of early warning signals prior to Iranian strikes. While Israeli intelligence agencies used to receive notifications via personal communications half an hour before operations and activate air raid sirens as soon as air targets approached, these signals have recently faded away, this suggests that Tehran has dried up the sources of espionage that previously delivered information to the enemy's defense systems.
These developments demonstrate that the success of Iranian intelligence has not been limited to striking enemy assets, but has also extended to the warning systems themselves, rendering the security landscape of the Zionist entity more fragile than its official rhetoric suggests.
Western reports indicate that Tel Aviv is experiencing internal confusion after losing what it considers "internal eyes" in Tehran, through which it established qualitative operations in the past, including sensitive assassinations during periods of escalation, with the exposure of these networks, the enemy's intelligence services are losing their ability to surprise, and Tehran is regaining a firmer grip on the internal security landscape.
The Iranian operation came within a broader regional landscape characterized by mutual escalation on multiple fronts. This security development constitutes a qualitative factor that strengthens Iran's position in formulating the multidimensional deterrence equation, especially in light of the ongoing engagement of resistance forces from Yemen, Palestine, and Lebanon.
Analysts agree that what happened was not an isolated security operation, but rather the culmination of a long, proactive process and a severe test that Tehran successfully overcame, Tehran was able to remove the masks of major powers operating in the shadows and strike a blow at the recruitment, financing, and planning centers at the heart of the Zionist intelligence project.
It has become clear that these networks were not isolated cells, but rather part of a regional operations room directly linked to Western agencies, this network had long sought to infiltrate Iran's security fabric, using advanced technical and human tools, including drones and agents planted in multiple locations within the capital, Tehran.
Iran's geographical environment was not far from this equation, the complexity of the terrain, the vastness of its territory, and the population density provided the enemy with advanced infiltration opportunities. However, the professionalism of Iranian surveillance foiled this bet and tightened the noose around these tools.
Analysts emphasize that dismantling these cells represents more than an achievement; it is a seizure of the initiative from the enemy and the establishment of a new equation in which deterrence is multi-faceted: intelligence, military, media, and cyber.
M.M
In one of the most complex security confrontations the Islamic Republic of Iran has faced since the victory of the revolution, the security services were able to absorb a highly dangerous intelligence breach carried out by multinational spy cells led by the Israeli Mossad, they transformed this challenge into a rare security opportunity to turn the tide and expose the enemy's tools deep within Iran.
The recently revealed operation was not a fleeting encounter, but rather a complex intelligence engagement planned over years. In addition to the Mossad, American, British, French, and German intelligence agencies, as well as Arab and Islamic actors, participated in the operation, these networks were activated at precise timing, with the aim of carrying out sabotage and assassination operations as part of a coordinated security escalation that coincided with the military attacks on Tehran.
According to informed sources, the dismantled cells had reached advanced stages of implementation and were dealt with as part of a comprehensive security plan that absorbed the shock and thwarted a series of sabotage plots against sovereign facilities, marking a qualitative shift in the course of the confrontation with the Zionist enemy.
Observers believe that what happened cannot be read in isolation from a long process of silent confrontation that began years ago, passed through assassinations and infiltration attempts, and reached this chapter, which revealed many cards that had been managed in the shadows, the enemy intelligence services, especially the Mossad, not only lost their members, but also burned their files, destroyed their networks, and left their agents to face their fate, at a moment when many analysts expressed a collapse on the ground at the level of the hidden war.
In a related field context, clear indications of the impact of this achievement on the enemy's infrastructure have emerged, including the disappearance of early warning signals prior to Iranian strikes. While Israeli intelligence agencies used to receive notifications via personal communications half an hour before operations and activate air raid sirens as soon as air targets approached, these signals have recently faded away, this suggests that Tehran has dried up the sources of espionage that previously delivered information to the enemy's defense systems.
These developments demonstrate that the success of Iranian intelligence has not been limited to striking enemy assets, but has also extended to the warning systems themselves, rendering the security landscape of the Zionist entity more fragile than its official rhetoric suggests.
Western reports indicate that Tel Aviv is experiencing internal confusion after losing what it considers "internal eyes" in Tehran, through which it established qualitative operations in the past, including sensitive assassinations during periods of escalation, with the exposure of these networks, the enemy's intelligence services are losing their ability to surprise, and Tehran is regaining a firmer grip on the internal security landscape.
The Iranian operation came within a broader regional landscape characterized by mutual escalation on multiple fronts. This security development constitutes a qualitative factor that strengthens Iran's position in formulating the multidimensional deterrence equation, especially in light of the ongoing engagement of resistance forces from Yemen, Palestine, and Lebanon.
Analysts agree that what happened was not an isolated security operation, but rather the culmination of a long, proactive process and a severe test that Tehran successfully overcame, Tehran was able to remove the masks of major powers operating in the shadows and strike a blow at the recruitment, financing, and planning centers at the heart of the Zionist intelligence project.
It has become clear that these networks were not isolated cells, but rather part of a regional operations room directly linked to Western agencies, this network had long sought to infiltrate Iran's security fabric, using advanced technical and human tools, including drones and agents planted in multiple locations within the capital, Tehran.
Iran's geographical environment was not far from this equation, the complexity of the terrain, the vastness of its territory, and the population density provided the enemy with advanced infiltration opportunities. However, the professionalism of Iranian surveillance foiled this bet and tightened the noose around these tools.
Analysts emphasize that dismantling these cells represents more than an achievement; it is a seizure of the initiative from the enemy and the establishment of a new equation in which deterrence is multi-faceted: intelligence, military, media, and cyber.
M.M