Sana'a - Saba:
Anyone who has studied American decisions over the decades will not find any fundamental difference or discrepancy between the effects and objectives underlying this decision.
This decision still has an imperialist, hegemonic dimension, targeting those who stand in the way of its imperialist projects.
Israeli Occupation is undoubtedly a purely American project. Even if it is a Western creation in its structure, its meaning and substance still rest on America.
Its weapons are American, its advisors are American, and its decision-making institutions enjoy American support in whatever direction they go. Before and after that, it has been Washington that has guarded it since its inception.
While the Israeli enemy has been reeling after days of accurate missile and complex strikes; Washington understood and understood well that the continuation of this missile attack would gradually target the Zionist enemy's most important capabilities, thus depleting its capabilities, which underpin its hegemony in the region.
After four days of continuous Iranian attacks, the Americans were forced to threaten to target Iran and enter into a war with Israel.
Although American could have continued, as usual, to provide unlimited support in the form of weapons and ammunition, American knew this would be futile. Or so the Israeli enemy portrayed the matter to it, in order to draw Washington into the arena of war in the region.
By this luring, the Israeli enemy saves itself and moves the war from one stage to a new one, one in which the confrontation is between Washington and Tehran.
The Israeli enemy thus overcomes the deadly Iranian attacks and their inevitable defeat, while simultaneously plunging the region into a war deadlock that will not stop with Iran and the United States.
There is no alternative but for Washington to enter the war directly to save the Israeli enemy from the daily loss of life. The rival here is Iran, which possesses a missile arsenal far superior in its capabilities to what Israeli fighter jets achieve in targeting Iranian territory.
Iranian missiles reach their targets in a few minutes, perhaps a little more. They have a very high destructive power and can bypass air defense systems. Within minutes, Iran can launch dozens or even hundreds of missiles at numerous targets, defeating Israel's air defense systems.
Israeli fighter jets, however, require significant time and supplies to reach Iranian territory, may not even bypass air defenses, and achieve only a fraction of the results achieved by Iranian missiles.
Washington's threat reflects the nature of the American decision, its background, its relationship with "Israel" in particular, and the extent of Jewish dominance over American decision-making, even if the decision ultimately favors America.
"Israel" grew and flourished under the American umbrella, if that is the case, and what the entity is committing in Gaza is being done with American cover. Trump's statements about reinvesting in the Gaza Strip and displacing its population cannot be ignored; these statements suggest that the killer is one and the same.
The massacres of starving people at so-called aid distribution centers have been brought to light, revealing they are under Israeli-American company supervision. This demonstrates that American support provides both the weaponry for all Israeli crimes and the cover for all Zionist transgressions.
From the above, It is concluded that the United States' threat to wage war against Iran is nothing new, but this time it has gone beyond the calculations of the American institutions themselves, which are behind the decision-making process. This can be seen in the reactions of some members of Congress, most recently Senator Tim Kaine, who said: "We cannot risk American lives on a foolish mission."
The question: Will Congress do it this time and prevent Trump from risking America's existence in the quagmire of the Israeli entity?
Anyone who has studied American decisions over the decades will not find any fundamental difference or discrepancy between the effects and objectives underlying this decision.
This decision still has an imperialist, hegemonic dimension, targeting those who stand in the way of its imperialist projects.
Israeli Occupation is undoubtedly a purely American project. Even if it is a Western creation in its structure, its meaning and substance still rest on America.
Its weapons are American, its advisors are American, and its decision-making institutions enjoy American support in whatever direction they go. Before and after that, it has been Washington that has guarded it since its inception.
While the Israeli enemy has been reeling after days of accurate missile and complex strikes; Washington understood and understood well that the continuation of this missile attack would gradually target the Zionist enemy's most important capabilities, thus depleting its capabilities, which underpin its hegemony in the region.
After four days of continuous Iranian attacks, the Americans were forced to threaten to target Iran and enter into a war with Israel.
Although American could have continued, as usual, to provide unlimited support in the form of weapons and ammunition, American knew this would be futile. Or so the Israeli enemy portrayed the matter to it, in order to draw Washington into the arena of war in the region.
By this luring, the Israeli enemy saves itself and moves the war from one stage to a new one, one in which the confrontation is between Washington and Tehran.
The Israeli enemy thus overcomes the deadly Iranian attacks and their inevitable defeat, while simultaneously plunging the region into a war deadlock that will not stop with Iran and the United States.
There is no alternative but for Washington to enter the war directly to save the Israeli enemy from the daily loss of life. The rival here is Iran, which possesses a missile arsenal far superior in its capabilities to what Israeli fighter jets achieve in targeting Iranian territory.
Iranian missiles reach their targets in a few minutes, perhaps a little more. They have a very high destructive power and can bypass air defense systems. Within minutes, Iran can launch dozens or even hundreds of missiles at numerous targets, defeating Israel's air defense systems.
Israeli fighter jets, however, require significant time and supplies to reach Iranian territory, may not even bypass air defenses, and achieve only a fraction of the results achieved by Iranian missiles.
Washington's threat reflects the nature of the American decision, its background, its relationship with "Israel" in particular, and the extent of Jewish dominance over American decision-making, even if the decision ultimately favors America.
"Israel" grew and flourished under the American umbrella, if that is the case, and what the entity is committing in Gaza is being done with American cover. Trump's statements about reinvesting in the Gaza Strip and displacing its population cannot be ignored; these statements suggest that the killer is one and the same.
The massacres of starving people at so-called aid distribution centers have been brought to light, revealing they are under Israeli-American company supervision. This demonstrates that American support provides both the weaponry for all Israeli crimes and the cover for all Zionist transgressions.
From the above, It is concluded that the United States' threat to wage war against Iran is nothing new, but this time it has gone beyond the calculations of the American institutions themselves, which are behind the decision-making process. This can be seen in the reactions of some members of Congress, most recently Senator Tim Kaine, who said: "We cannot risk American lives on a foolish mission."
The question: Will Congress do it this time and prevent Trump from risking America's existence in the quagmire of the Israeli entity?
